Home Snooker STATTOS GET THEIR DAY IN THE SUN IN SNOOKER — Inside Snooker

STATTOS GET THEIR DAY IN THE SUN IN SNOOKER — Inside Snooker

0
STATTOS GET THEIR DAY IN THE SUN IN SNOOKER — Inside Snooker

[ad_1]

Each from time to time within the media centre on the snooker there’s a full-on statto problem thrown down.

In days passed by it will have been Phil Yates or Dave Hendon that may sorted this type of factor out, at the moment it will often be Matt Huart, previously of ProSnookerBlog fame and now on the WPBSA payroll (maybe for being formally the one one that really understands the trivia of the rating techniques and qualification standards in all their varieties).

The hapless hacks in right here often provide you with a half-decent potential thought for a narrative, after which Matt kindly places some flesh on the statistical bones – both confirming this line of enquiry is yielding one thing fascinating, or politely capturing it down in flames as being a complete waste of time.

Numerous these conversations are hypotheticals and we had one such dialogue yesterday as Ronnie O’Sullivan raced into the quarter-finals for the lack of simply three frames. What, I requested Matt, was the fewest variety of frames that had been conceded in profitable a UK title?

Now typically I’ve to admit, and plenty of would verify, stats will not be high of my agenda, being naturally extra drawn to the event, the consequence, the ambiance, the agony and the ecstasy sport can generate, and listening to from the lead actors, the gamers.

However with out query there are occasions when the statistic IS the story, particularly in terms of making historical past or setting data.

As one other instance I just lately bought a peek on the common shot time listing for the season as much as the UK Championship – and any self-respecting journalist may make a narrative out of who was high and backside of that listing (wait and see – or simply have a guess…).

If there may be one factor a statto loves although it’s consistency, a foundation of comparability that’s like for like – and on this entrance we rapidly bumped into issues on the entire ‘fewest frames conceded by a UK winner’ query.

Within the UK through the years you will have had gamers coming in at a final 16, final 32, and final 128 stage. You’ve gotten had finals that have been better of 31 frames, or better of 19. You’ve gotten had early-round matches that have been better of 17 frames, or better of 11. You’ve gotten had gamers profitable 4 matches to elevate the trophy, or seven.

Usually Matt’s travails begin with him working again from a primary guess after which seeing if it may be crushed. On this case the start line was Stephen Maguire in 2004 (19 frames, a 32-player draw, better of 17 body matches as much as better of 19 body remaining).

That was then crushed by Doug Mountjoy in 1978 (18 frames, a 16-player draw for him, better of 17 then a better of 29 remaining).

Steve Davis dropped simply 14 frames in 1980 plus one in an earlier qualifier, and Stephen Hendry 12 in 1995. For Davis this was a 16-player draw, better of 17 adopted by a better of 31 remaining. And for Hendry it was a 32-player draw, better of 17 after which a better of 19 remaining (though he did win a qualifier too earlier pre-venue, technically dropping an additional three frames to Jamie Burnett).

However Davis wins the prize for his 1981 effort in a 16-player draw, providing up simply 10 frames in beating Willie Thorne 9-2, Invoice Werbeniuk 9-5, Jimmy White 9-0 after which Terry Griffiths 16-3.

You may additionally notice that the present 128-player format with better of 11s and a better of 19 remaining means the identical variety of frames should be gained as when it was a 32-player draw, better of 17s till a better of 19 remaining (46 in complete).

However the reality of it’s that’s about half an hour of all of our lives – and now one other 20 minutes of mine – that I’ll by no means get again.

 

[ad_2]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here